andre:gribeetos vairaak zinaat ar ko tad d800e bez taa low pass filtra atshiraas no parastaa d800
Baumo, ka esot krietni "asāks", nav vairs filtra radītais blūrs. Komplektā ar D800E nākšot jaunais Capture Nx, kurā jau būs iestrādāta "virtuālā" filtra iespēja, lai kaut nedaudz kompensētu reāla filtra neesamību.
So should you pay more to get the E then? If your photography subject is versatile, I would say get the non-E by all means. To most people, the difference made by the anti-aliasing property is negligible, and you really have to magnify to see the difference clearly. For those photography situations where there is no moire pattern to worry about and aliasing is not as much as an important issue as full resolution and sharpness, the E version does offer an advantage.
Pieejot tai D800E lietai tīri loģiski, nav saprotams, kāpēc E versijai jāmaksā dārgāk, ja vienkārši netiek izmantots filtrs (sanāk vēl ekonomija uz materiāliem)?
laiksfoto_lv:Pieejot tai D800E lietai tīri loģiski, nav saprotams, kāpēc E versijai jāmaksā dārgāk, ja vienkārši netiek izmantots filtrs (sanāk vēl ekonomija uz materiāliem)?
viss ir loģiski. Stringi arī ir dārgāki par pļūtenēm... :P
andre:gribeetos vairaak zinaat ar ko tad d800e bez taa low pass filtra atshiraas no parastaa d800
Ja tu uzdod tādu jautājumu,tad tev vajag versiju bez E.Baigi specifisks risinājums priekš baijera matricas.Senlaikos kādu strēķi pabildēju ar kodaku,kam arī tā filtra nebija,tā bija kamera,kas pat koku lapās spēja uzradīt krāsainus artefaktus,par regulārām struktūrām i nerunājot.
andre:gribeetos vairaak zinaat ar ko tad d800e bez taa low pass filtra atshiraas no parastaa d800
Ja tu uzdod tādu jautājumu,tad tev vajag versiju bez E.Baigi specifisks risinājums priekš baijera matricas.Senlaikos kādu strēķi pabildēju ar kodaku,kam arī tā filtra nebija,tā bija kamera,kas pat koku lapās spēja uzradīt krāsainus artefaktus,par regulārām struktūrām i nerunājot.
My assistant shoots with a D3x without the AA, I shoot with a D3x with the AA. I haven't seen an image yet that has meaningful, visible moire out of my assistant's camera. But we're also not printing at over 24" and we also don't shoot things with absolutely repetitive patterns. Bird feathers don't really count here, for example, as there is a bit of randomness to their size and weave, so you don't get the huge areas of nasty moire that you get from, say, certain fabrics shot with certain lenses at a certain distance (a fashion shooter can always move and change the moire production, but that changes perspective, and they'd have to notice it being produced in the first place).
laiksfoto_lv:Pieejot tai D800E lietai tīri loģiski, nav saprotams, kāpēc E versijai jāmaksā dārgāk, ja vienkārši netiek izmantots filtrs (sanāk vēl ekonomija uz materiāliem)?
izskatās, ka nevis netiek izmantots filtrs, bet gan tiek izmantots savādāks filtrs (no www.imaging-resource.com...):
Nikon has acknowledged photographers desire for the maximum resolution--even if potentially at the expense of moiré issues--by offering two versions of the D800. The standard Nikon D800 includes a low-pass filter appropriate to the camera's resolution, while a more limited-edition Nikon D800E variant replaces the standard low-pass filter, increasing image resolution. Nikon's approach in this is interesting, and has been the subject of some confusion in the early going after the D800E's announcement. The diagram below explains how the D800E's low-pass filter is set up.
First of all, it should be noted that the D800E does still include a low-pass filter, but Nikon has used the second layer of the LPF to undo the effects of the first.
imgfoto:Njā 700 kļūs par reliktiem, saprotu ka no pārdošanas noņemās
nu, tā kā man tik vien pieder (ja drīkst citēt komjaunatnes prēmijas laureātu Jonu Avīžus!) kā piepirstas bikses pie pakaļas (džentelmeni takš visvieglāk apjāt! ), tad laikam jāpriecājās, ka varēšu lēti D700 atpirkt no kāda, kurš apgrādēsies uz D800!